May 26, 2013

Streetwise Professor » I Was Wrong. But Not as Wrong as What I Was Wrong About.

SWP points out the worst of Dodd Frank (in his opinion), the Made Available to Trade rule (MAT). Have a read of his post, then think about some scenarios this could cause:

  • First SEF to launch covers a wide range of products – suddenly  other SEFs are forced to support the same set of products
  • A group of SEFs meet privately and agree to limit the scope of products Made Available to Trade, so as to keep costs and complexity down
  • Chaos ensues where every SEF is in a free-for-all to launch products in their specialised markets – but due to MAT, they have to also include any product from any other SEF, causing an endless cycle of upgrades
  • Software vendors & the SEF users in a nightmare upgrade scenario, adding product support on a daily basis

Surely allowing SEFs to specialise and launch products adhoc without causing every other SEF to support the same products is a common sense approach, which we can see now. What's the view from the Front Office? Anyone know? Streetwise Professor » I Was Wrong. But Not as Wrong as What I Was Wrong About..

Most Viewed


Related Articles

September 15, 2022

Tradefeedr Hires Alexis Fauth as Head of Data Science and Client Analytics



September 6, 2022

Siege FX announces the launch of NetFix



August 2, 2022

OSTTRA and LCH collaborate to reconcile bilateral OTC trade data


Post Trade Processing