January 13, 2020
Where in the World is Your Transaction on a DLT?
When data is stored in a distributed systems such as a ledger, in multiple physical locations, how does that effect the application of law in a dispute or bankruptcy?
ISDA have published a new paper entitled "Private International Law Aspects of Smart Derivatives Contracts Utilizing Distributed Ledger Technology". Sounds like a big deal and it probably is.
- Parties to an ISDA Master are free to elect the governing jurisdiction for their trades
- In the paper the example is a permissioned ledger (Corda) where all parties are known and tied back to nodes on the network
- The paper makes clear that an open access permissionless ledger would bring uncertainty and be an unlikely place to record OTC transactions
- The paper considers two scenarios a) an uncollaterised swap and b) a collateralised swap
- Scenario B) matters when securities are pledged to cover exposure and a corresponding record is made on the ledger. And in a sub-scenario where the ledger records an asset like a cryptocurrency coin as collateral
- In summary the law already has many mechanisms to establish which court a dispute would be heard in.
- For ISDA OTC transactions the use of a DLT doesn't have a material effect on the law. In small cases the location of the operator of a ledger may be relevant.
Sep. 15, 2022
Tradefeedr Hires Alexis Fauth as Head of Data Science and Client Analytics
Sep. 06, 2022
Siege FX announces the launch of NetFix
Aug. 02, 2022
OSTTRA and LCH collaborate to reconcile bilateral OTC trade data
Jul. 26, 2022
Sell-side systems in need of upgrade for new risk reality
Jul. 15, 2022